Poetic Knowledge: Dendrites and Intercession

I haven’t even finished the chapter but I had so many thoughts I had to get down! Now I feel frozen and unable to articulate all I thought and said aloud in the shower.

Sigh.

I remembered some of what I learned in high school about the brain, in particular, dendrites. I recalled that dendrites are the branch like structures that connect our brain cells. The more we have the more “connected” our brain is. We can grow dendrites by learning.

Then I thought of Shields and how it wasn’t until he worked on a farm that mathematical principles made sense to him. I wondered if doing and learning certain things will grow the dendrite connections in certain ways. I theorized that I could use the scientific method to prove my idea that “the order of poetic knowledge” along with the rhetoric and dialectic degrees of knowledge are elements of a complete knowledge set to make one wise and whole. Those who implement all the order of reasoning will have greater dendrite growth and connections that they would not have if only focusing on one type of reasoning. This is why, the poetic senses Shields used in his farm work allowed him to comprehend the mathematic principles he was taught in school. There was no other way for him.

I also pondered Godly communication and how he likes to use symbol and parable to teach the faithful. In this way the mysteries of God can be revealed to those who are prepared and ready for such knowledge and wisdom while those who are not ready simply hear a story or see a mark – understanding and insight can be gained only if we are prepared.

We need to work and participate in wholesome recreation such as “traditional crafts that endured up to preindustrial, pretechnological times” to cultivate the poetic knowledge attributes within ourselves and those we teach.

As I had these notions fly through my mind I thought about the new (to me) gardening method I’m working on - square foot gardening. This will be a great way to teach arithmetic in a whole knowledge sense verses a textbook and worksheets. This will allow myself and my children to “get” math and math “get us”, among other subjects. I have recently taken an interest in sewing and knitting and although I have not yet taken up knitting (waiting on my ordered supplies) I am sure it will expand my mind in more ways and areas of knowledge then just the craft itself. Surely these things will help us to “relate…facts into ideas.”

This assurance stems from my earlier idea that Godly communication is in symbol and parable and what better way to gain more symbol and parable fare then through beautiful creation and work? The more we allow ourselves and our children to delve into the 4 degrees of knowledge the more complete we will be and the more prepared to receive of the “mysteries of God”. Sadly the trends of our society and public schooling system only endorse one method and, as Taylor pointed out through Verhoeven we will be, “condemned to lifelong mediocrity” unless there is intervention.

I testify to you that we are the intervention! Our teaching our children and learning and growing with each other and them are the intercession!

With all the advantages of our day how much more could we know, have, and be if only most of us would balance these areas of knowledge? What could someone contribute to the good of all if they worked hard in providing for themselves through more means then just employment for the almighty dollar, say a garden and raising some animals too? What if that same person practiced homeopathic medicine, nature studies, a craft or trade, and was well read in a broad range of areas (yet deeply in their chosen topics)? How about if that person was one of Godly principle and virtue, who pondered and served their fellow brothers and sisters in the Lord?

What is our potential really?

What is our children’s potential?

So often I feel that despite all our technological advances and “civilization” we are a world full of back-sliding barbarians.

May we do the following:

Six days shalt thou labour, and do all they work:

But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: (Exodus 20:9-10)

And as all have not faith, seek ye diligently and teach one another words of wisdom; yea, seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom; seek learning, even by study and also by faith.

Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing; and establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God;(D & C 88:118-119).

Amen…

P.S. “The renowned brain researcher Dr. Marian Diamond…poetically describes it [dendritic growth]: We began with a nerve cell, which starts in the embryo as just a sort of sphere. It sends its first branch out to overcome ignorance. As it reaches out, it is gathering knowledge and it is becoming creative. Then we become a little more idealistic, generous, and altruistic; but it is our six-sided dendrites which give us wisdom."

Who created the dendrites? I testify it was our Father in Heaven.

…and Amen.

Poetic Knowledge Ch.4 Part 2

Taylor covers Rousseau:

"Love childhood, indulge its games, its pleasures, its delightful instincts....Why pave the way for future regret for yourselves by robbing them of the short span which nature has allotted them. As soon as they are aware of the joy of life, let them rejoice in it, so that whenever God calls them they may not die without having tasted the joy of life."

Even so Rousseau "fails to see the real purpose of them [the senses] as they are integrated with the emotions, will and intellect--the emotions (via the senses) moved by wonder; the will, naturally attracted to the good; and, the mind inclined intuitively to the truth."

"Rousseau's Naturalism...is unnatural in that it rejects the natural human faculties of the will and intellect...example...'Let the child do nothing on anybody's word. Nothing is good for him unless he feels it to be so.'"

Upon first reading this I thought of the public school indoctrination of values clarification.

The other thing that stood out to me is Taylors bit on Verhoeven:

"Verhoeven's study of the separation of wonder from philosophy reveals the devastating effects on education....what passes for general education today is actually a barrier to knowledge in the absence of the poetic element of wonder.

'General education is...a substitute for knowledge among people for whom that knowledge is too dangerous and too demanding...It creates and preserves mediocrity. It does not demand that contact with things, the piercing of man's self righteous subjectivity which is precisely the beginning of knowledge....At best it displays mountain peaks, but saves one the trouble of climbing them..........The great temptation of education is to insist that one should memorize the results of science instead of flinging open its sources"

In reading this section I wrote in the margin, "This [mindset] comes about out of selfishness and the false idea of scarcity."

Poetic Knowledge 4.1: Men's philosophies have separated us from what is real

Okay, once again I found this section very applicable to having a negative affect on the understanding of my world view.

According to Taylor Descartes, Hume, Kant, Dewey, Wittgenstein and Ayer all have three things in common:

"One, they all begin with the consciousness, the mind, as the starting point of reality, as opposed to an independent existence outside the knower; two, doubt, as in the modern scientific mode, is the method of procedure to establish, if possible, certitude, or some experimental social agendas; and, three, following from number two, all these philosophies distrust, if they do not reject, the traditional view that the senses, inner and outer, are intimately integrated in the act of knowing with the will and the intellect, and have, as it were, a cognitive power in themselves, a light whose source is the illuminative energy of the mind that knows reality immediately and certainly.

To summarize, then, in the spirit of Maritain: these modern philosophies stemming from Descartes all violate a primordial disposition of man, doing violence to his very nature as a specific being, who is capable of knowing his world as a whole being, integrated and entire, body and soul, recognizing unselfconsciously and spontaneously, that all is real and good. It is only when an exaggerated and isolated status of the mind is assumed, and removed from its proper integration within the knowing powers, that Descartes and his legacy gain prominence."

Several times Taylor brought up the topic of "first principles" which brings to mind a tenant of my faith which says in part, "We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the gospel are: first, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ...'. Although, as Taylor says, Descartes "was convinced...his method would lead to truth" we are instead left with "a preoccupation with doubt". Obviously if one practices doubt that is what they will be filled with. If one practices faith, on the other hand, then that is what they will be filled with. Now, I looked up the definition of doubt and faith at dictionary.com. Doubt received 5 definition group results, faith received 0, zip, nada, zilch.

Hmmmmmm........ **

Regardless...here are some definitions for you:

Doubt: to distrust,a feeling of uncertainty about the truth, reality, or nature of something.
Antonyms for doubt: Assurance, certainty, conviction
Faith: "Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" Heb. 11:1 KJV JST

So we see that doubt and faith are opposing ideas and Descartes and his Cartesian legacy are against God and faith because those ideas lead to, "the ultimate rejection of the necessary first principles and self-evident truths". How perfectly in line with Satan's desires. He is a fallen spirit (Isaiah 14:12) with no body and tries to do all he can to separate us from the spirit + body = soul connection.

Once again, I am strongly impressed that what Taylor refers to as Poetic knowledge is actually a spiritual inspiration and knowing. So much of our socially accepted norms of our day work to separate us from this well of knowledge by either telling us it is not important, "only science and math is" or by distracting us from the whisperings of wisdom with constant "noise" from TV, video games, twitter, radio, etc. “The Spirit speaketh the truth and lieth not. Wherefore, it speaketh of things as they really are, and of things as they really will be; wherefore, these things are manifested unto us plainly, for the salvation of our souls” Jacob 4:13

I thought this scripture is a good one to ponder in relation to Taylors book and his definition of fear: "And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding." Job 28:28 KJV see also verses 12-13, 20-23

In another reading of mine I found this quote applicable: "If the world is to be improved, the process of love must make a change in the hearts of humans. It can do so when we look beyond self to give our love to God and others, and do so with all our hearts, with all our souls, and with all our minds." Gordon B. Hinckley Standing for Something p.9

How can we fully love with all our hearts, souls, and minds when the philosophies of the world separate us from our complete selves?

**When this was originally written on 5/10/11 there were no definitions for faith (I have the screen prints as proof) but by the night of 5/13 there were definitions and today when I checked there are 8 listings. 5/15/11

Poetic Knowledge: Foundational (Ch.3 part 2)

Taylor states, "St. Thomas Aquinas said poetry occupies the lowest order of knowledge because it is less distinct and tends to be obscure compared to scientific knowledge." I believe this to mean "lowest order" in the sense of foundational - first rung of the ladder rather than low as in degrading, crude, or lacking honour or desirability. This is a very important understanding that does not exist, to the extent it should, due to our society's embracing of scientific knowledge as the only knowledge worth anything.

I was talking to a friend about this yesterday when I had an epiphany. Now, normally I do not do disclaimers but seeing as how I only know most of you ladies through the blogging world and not in a face to face personal basis and I know most of you are not of the same faith I am I will do one. I am not trying to preach or convert, only explain the epiphany. I am a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and in addition to the King James Version of the Holy Bible we have The Book of Mormon, Doctrine & Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price as our scriptural cannon to nourish our souls with. Please bear with me my fellow Poetic Knowledge readers as I'd like to share a parable from the Book of Mormon that was a part of my epiphany. It is called Lehi's vision of the tree of life (part of the verses are Lehi talking and part are his son, Nephi, explaining the vision, any emphasis is mine)

[Lehi speaking here]
7...I beheld myself that I was in a dark and dreary waste.

8And after I had traveled for the space of many hours in darkness, I began to pray unto the Lord that he would have mercy on me, according to the multitude of his tender mercies.

9And it came to pass after I had prayed unto the Lord I beheld a large and spacious field.

10And it came to pass that I beheld a tree, whose fruit was desirable to make one happy.

11And it came to pass that I did go forth and partake of the fruit thereof; and I beheld that it was most sweet, above all that I ever before tasted. Yea, and I beheld that the fruit thereof was white, to exceed all the whiteness that I had ever seen.

12And as I partook of the fruit thereof it filled my soul with exceedingly great joy; wherefore, I began to be desirous that my family should partake of it also; for I knew that it was desirable above all other fruit.

13And as I cast my eyes round about, that perhaps I might discover my family also, I beheld a river of water; and it ran along, and it was near the tree of which I was partaking the fruit...

26And I also cast my eyes round about, and beheld, on the other side of the river of water, a great and spacious building; and it stood as it were in the air, high above the earth.

27And it was filled with people, both old and young, both male and female; and their manner of dress was exceedingly fine; and they were in the attitude of mocking and pointing their fingers towards those who had come at and were partaking of the fruit...

33And great was the multitude that did enter into that strange building. And after they did enter into that building they did point the finger of scorn at me and those that were partaking of the fruit also; but we heeded them not.

[Nephi speaking now to end]
34These are the words of my father: For as many as heeded them, had fallen away...

18And the large and spacious building, which thy father saw, is vain imaginations and the pride of the children of men. And a great and a terrible gulf divideth them; yea, even the word of the justice of the Eternal God, and the Messiah who is the Lamb of God, of whom the Holy Ghost beareth record, from the beginning of the world until this time, and from this time henceforth and forever...

35And the multitude of the earth was gathered together; and I beheld that they were in a large and spacious building, like unto the building which my father saw. And the angel of the Lord spake unto me again, saying: Behold the world and the wisdom thereof; yea, behold the house of Israel hath gathered together to fight against the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

36And it came to pass that I saw and bear record, that the great and spacious building was the pride of the world; and it fell, and the fall thereof was exceedingly great. And the angel of the Lord spake unto me again, saying: Thus shall be the destruction of all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, that shall fight against the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Now for the epiphany: As I was talking to my friend I told her that poetic knowledge is a foundational knowledge, in fact I really think it is a spiritual intuition, knowing beyond knowing. Our society only values the scientific knowledge - then it hit me! Our society, with it's value and pride in science, is in the great and spacious building that has no firm foundation and will fall.

Be sure to check out the other Poetic Knowledge rabbit trails here:
http://www.pelennorfields.com/mystie/2011/poetic-knowledge-book-club-connatural-intentional-and-intuitive-knowledge-part-2/

Poetic Knowledge: Ch.3 Pt. 1 and Senses

Okay, I had a tough time with this one. Maybe it's because I was distracted while I read it and had to read it over several days in the van while waiting for my hubbie to do errands while I had a massive headache...Really reading it over days usually isn't a problem for me, just the reading tough stuff with a headache.

Anywho...

Since I had a tough time and since poetic knowledge has to do with the senses I thought I'd share some things that have really appealed to me at sundry times and places. Things that I have craved for and had an overwhelming sense of satisfaction yet continual desire for.

Smell: Nearly 15 years ago I had some very tough times with family and personally. I was learning massage therapy along with some students who were very into aromatherapy. They introduced me to the scent of Sweet Orange and Sandalwood. For the longest time I couldn't get enough of that scent. Thinking on the experience now I would like to research those scents and see what their attributes are and see if somehow it was due to those attributes and my needs at the time that it was nourishing me. I'll have to look into that now...

Sound: Beethoven, Symphony 7, Allegretto, mvt 2. You can listen to this and see a fascinating visual display too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uOxOgm5jQ4. My absolute favorite part is the second minute but the who piece is beautiful. I'm not sure why but it really speaks to me at this time in my life.

Visual: When I was in high school (and before then too) I had the great advantage of being in the dance program. It was new in West Anchorage High and for the three years I was there I spent my lunch, dance class hour, and many after school hours in the dance studio (at one point I wasn't able to get into dance so I took typing instead and would speed through my work and the kind teacher would let me go to dance). When I wasn't actually dancing I would listen to music with my eyes closed and visualize the choreography. I still do it from time to time but I really don't have the ability like I used to.

Taste: I'm not sure this counts as a poetic experience per se but there is a dessert I recently discovered that is just divine. I'm a big chocolate lover but this is better! Really the only way to eat it is in snitched bites here and there when you shouldn't be eating it. Don't ask me why. It just is. You can try it, the recipe is here: http://thepioneerwoman.com/cooking/2008/02/apple_dumplings/

Touch: Since I did massage therapy I naturally received a lot of professional massages. But in all honesty I find the most relaxing touch is when someone runs their fingers through my hair (hmmmm, maybe I should tell my husband that?). The most thrilling touch I had was when I first met my husband and he would greet me quickly by squeezing my arm then rush off. What a tease he was! Ha ha ha! Again, I don't know if those would count as poetic but like I said, I had a bad headache while reading this and so this is my contribution! *smile*

Okay, I did get some things from this section:

1. "...the habit of poetic intelligence as a way of seeing the world, seeing the significance in the superficial, what most would dismiss, ignore, or never notice. Indeed, 'the way in which ideas arise in our minds,' while not poetry, is poetic." Just tonight a friend wrote to me, "It is so fun to read your thoughts because you make so many connections from so many different sources. The information is wonderfully stimulating word candy." Without a broad base of knowledge and deeper base in many areas it is hard for one to make such poetic connections. Here again is where the public school system fails our children in true knowledge because they keep everything so shallow. Makes me think of the song What I Am by Edie Brickell. I see Satan's influence and trickery all around. I recently saw a TIME magazine cover titled: What If There's No Hell. I didn't read it but I want to testify that Satan is real and there is Hell! The fact that that was the cover of a prominent magazine is evidence of Satan's reality because Satan doesn't want us to think he is real!

Okay, jumping off my soapbox now.

2. I found this part very telling, "...the credibility of intuitive knowledge was a kind of given in the power of the knower. The deliberate treatment of poetic knowledge by Maritain and others becomes necessary only after the seventeenth century and the ascendancy of science as the preeminent method of learning." Especially when joined with a previous section, "Abstraction, concepts, analysis, by themselves, isolate us from the real." These characteristics are all part of science. I believe science had it's place but it should not be isolated from all other sources of knowledge like it is in our world today. The more complicated we make things the further we get from what is real and true and good. I could go on but it's late and I want to post so...

...that's all for now folks!

See other posts on this book: http://www.pelennorfields.com/mystie/poetic-knowledge-book-club/

The Headgate: Require Work and Inspire Daily

I think, for this post, I will do it bullet point style: Require Work

1. I want to refocus on REAL work and not create a bunch of busy work for my family. To me real work includes:

• daily, weekly, monthly, seasonal chores




• Skill training such as: sewing, making needed items from scratch, knitting, wood gathering, fire starting, etc.




• Busy work is much of the type of "school" work children get in the public school system. I don't want to focus on this.

2. I knew this from the first reading but still need to work on it: My 2 oldest (8 and 9) should be able to do more work independently.

Which brings me to referencing another book: There is a free ebook on http://simplycharlottemason.com/ called Smooth and Easy Days. In it is a quote by Charlotte Mason, "What we must guard against in the training of children is the danger of their getting into the habit of being prodded to every duty and every effort." This is from Vol. 3, p. 39, I need to read that section as I know part of my problem with my two eldest is we have fallen into that very danger. If I am not by their side every second making sure they are doing what they should be they go off on tangents. I'll have to do a bit more studying, pondering, and praying about this issue! Suggestions welcome.

Inspire Daily

1. Tibbets says, "It is essential in this system that I choose the story, and they choose whether or not to attend." I think I need to refocus and start with this. We do not have a daily time where I read aloud to them. Our read aloud time is sporadic and I have not been choosing the best books. Honestly, the oldest are still in core (based on Tibbet's assessment chart) as they always want to play outside, then they then want me to read at inoportune times (like bedtime at 10pm). So, and this just hit me as I was writing this, I'm going to set a consistant time (during the day), announce it, and if they are playing they can decide to come in or not. We'll see how that goes!




2. Tibbets mentioned reading aloud from journals. We do this, not daily mind you but when they request it. Some years ago I got little notebooks to write in for each child things they say or do that I wanted to remember. They just love it when we read from them, I keep them handy so I can jot quick things down. If I find I must write something for one of them I try to search my recent memory to see if there is something to write in the others as well. I should try to write in them on a more frequent basis though.




3. "All of the core values can be easily learned simply by hearing great stories." Once again, I have to throw in some ideas from the book Poetic Knowledge I talked about last post.
   
   
   

   ...an example of poetic learning...the child...left alone,undistracted by methods and systems, so that the senses and emotions come naturally into play when being read to, where wonder and delight gradually lead the child's imagination and memory toward the imitative act of reading...the same approach can be used for the child learning to write, that is, by first simply listening to stories. Poetic experience and knowledge is essentially passive, and listening is above all the gateway, along with looking, to the poetic mode...we don't just learn about something...we simultaneously learn how we feel as we learn."





4. In relation to the types of stories we share with our children. Sunday, in Stake Conference a speaker related a story in which he shared the restoration story with a friend. When he asked his friend what he thought about that story the friend responded by saying, "that's the wildest story!" The speaker then stated that the world wants us to think it (the story of the restoration of the gospel) a wild story. I think by wild meaning: crazy and unbelieavable. Here are my notes on that:
   
   
   

   "If we, as a society as a whole, were more familiar with classic stories we would be more apt to believe in such stories/miracles and not think them "wild". All the modern stories of such a nature are recognized fiction. If our children grew up on scripture stories and Plutarch's Lives miracles and visions would be more accepted."

And...that's all for now folks!

Poetic Knowledge: Foundation for Science example 2

Example 2 (this won't be as long, I promise!)

Again, Taylor emphasizes, "One of the ...main reasons for using the term poetic was that it is a sensory experience and, at the same time, a passionate one, where we are moved." He then quotes St. Thomas, "For we see that the senses are for the sake of the intellect, and not the other way about. The sense, moreover, is a certain deficient participation of the intellect."


Afterthoughts pointed out this article (which she got from Dawn): Dr. Jeff Myers' antidote to the brain damage caused by excessive media use in children"

This article says the,

"The brain was designed in such a way that work and accomplishment stimulate the executive center of the brain..., which...stimulates the pleasure center of the brain...Work brings satisfaction, and the desire for life satisfaction motivates people to work."

One study in relation to video games and the influence they have on 7-14 yr. old boys found that, "playing video games lights up the pleasure center of the brain while simultaneously shutting off blood flow to the executive center of the brain. In effect, these games offered boys the sense that they had accomplished something without actually having done so.”


Sorry I’m quoting so much, but this is good stuff,

“Consider the shocking implications. The games children play are designed to bring effortless pleasure (movies and music have the same effect). Over time, this slickly produced entertainment ‘tricks’ the brain into by-passing the executive center, making it more rewarding to pursue entertainment and less rewarding to accomplish anything of value.

How to fix this? According to the article, “…to rescue teens from the cultural addiction: engage them in conversation in the context of doing real things.”

How easy is that? The answer is explained more but essentially you “close the Headgates” (there will be a withdrawal period), do meaningful and real work together, and have significant conversations (passive listening to talk will not do the trick).


Here is the conversation science:

“Language lights up the brain…in order to trigger the use of language, both motivation (from the executive center) and arousal (from the pleasure center) are required…Language seems to be a bridge that reconnects the broken-down relationship between the executive and pleasure centers of the brain.”

Satan is so cleaver isn’t he? The very things that are best for us (like work and meaningful conversation) he has tricked us by inspiring men to create things that trick us into entertaining our lives away while forsaking the best. These entertainments dull the senses and trick the mind into weak passion, both essential traits of poetic knowledge…and I venture to say spiritual knowledge.


Did you know that Booker T. Washington’s history is very interesting in relation to this topic? My friend was telling me about his history…he was learned, he taught others who thought to be learned was to not have to work, he was an example to them that work is still for the learned. True education and work are essential parts of God’s plan for us. I see evidence of it in the Poetic Knowledge book, many other classic works, science studies, and a good life in general.

Poetic Knowledge: Foundation for Science?

Just thinking out loud, so to speak. I do not claim to fully understand this book as it is my first reading. That said, I found it interesting that scientific knowledge can act as a witness of poetic knowledge. I saw this instance at least twice in the section. Which makes sense as scientific knowledge stems from and has a foundation of poetic knowledge. Maybe that is a way to verify if the science is true by tracing it back to it's poetic source, if there is no poetic source then perhaps truth is lacking?

Example 1

Taylor states, "It was from Socrates, to Aristotle, to Augustine, that we learned there must be present something of the beautiful embedded as a universal in the particular object that gives rise to wonder and delight for there to be poetic experience." He later quotes Umberto Eco thus, "'The soul recognized in material objects a harmony identical with that of its own structure, and this recognition was the genesis of aesthetic pleasure.'"

I had my Thomas Jefferson Education (hereafter TJ Ed) bookclub Friday night last. Don't ask me how the topic went from Plutarch's Lives of Lycurgus, Numa Pompilius, Alexander, and Caesar to dinosaurs, Yetti, aliens, truth (no one has the market on truth), and electrons (to name a few of the many subjects discussed) but it did, maybe that's the great thing about classics, eh? They have such broad, yet deep application. Sorry, I digress a bit....

Electrons. One bookclub member brought up some articles he about electrons I found applicable to poetic knowledge. He sent me the articles. From one (sorry, he didn't tell me the title of the book*. I'll have to get that later) it states,

"In 1923 French physicist Louis de Broglie proposed the idea that an electron, like a photon of light, could behave both as a particle and as a wave. This discovery made scientists 'giddy' again. They were used to thinking of nature's objectivity: A flower is a flower; a tree is a tree. In the quantum world, a particle is a particle sometimes and a wave sometimes."

The article goes on to explain the "Two-Slit Experiment" that german physicist Max Born conducted to test the Broglie theory. In it Born sets up three testing areas. Each area consists of a screen with two doors that can be closed with a solid panel behind the screen. Each test "shoots" something at the screen with one door closed, then the other door closed, then both doors open. The first test uses a machine gun shooting bullets, the next water waves, and the third electrons. Born made curve diagrams for each test result. The bullets are like particles and made a pattern one would expect. The water waves resulted in a pattern one would expect too. Now for the interesting part,

"Since electrons are particles, the logical expectation is that they would form a pattern like the bullet pattern. The electrons behaved like particles, like the bullets, going through the slits, but they made a pattern on the screen like the water waves. The switch from particle pattern to wave pattern made no sense.

Born Shone a light behind the slits to see what was going on. When he watched the electron particles with his light, they made a particle pattern like bullets instead of the wave pattern they made when he was not watching. Then he dimmed the light and the pattern began to look like the wave patterns again. His conclusion was that electrons are one way or the other. If anyone sees them they are particles; if no one sees them they are waves. Electrons seem to come into existence as real objects or particles only when someone observes them."

The other article about electrons is found at this site: http://thetheoryofeverythingblog.com/particle-physics/the-electrons-shocking-story/ The relevant material is under the heading: The Electron and Its Shell. This article states,

"The electron pairs in each sublevel do not revolve around the nucleus in a conventional sense...Due to the electrons size and energy level when orbiting the nucleus, the electron is in all of the possible places at once. If we were to freeze-frame the atom, we could only see where the particle is, but would have no indication of speed or direction. In short, the electron in motion is a wave of possibilities all at once, until we observe it, rendering it a stationary particle but never both at once."

This made me think of Toy Story and how the toys play on their own when no one is looking and freeze in place when people are around. So the toys are like electron waves when unseen and like electron particles when seen.

How does this tie in to poetic knowledge? The poetic source in these articles are the scientists themselves and their love for what they are researching. It is only through them and their attention that the electrons come into being so to speak. They are the "something beautiful" giving "rise to wonder and delight" in the experiment experience. It is through them that, "the soul recognized" the electrons thus causing them to be "material objects...and this recognition was the genesis of aesthetic pleasure."

Just a thought...I could be wrong...I'm sure this has all come out as incoherent babble...

Okay, this is too long as it is. My next example will have to be in another post I'll do later this week.

*Shoot me an email if you want to read this paper. becky_teacher@yahoo.com

See other posts on this book: http://www.pelennorfields.com/mystie/2011/poetic-knowledge-book-club-chapter-2-part-2-the-philosophical-foundations/

The Headgate and Poetic Knowledge

So...right now I am reading more than one book for a blogging book club. It just so happens that, unbeknownst to me, both books compliment each other quite well, so far. Last year, during my ever expanding quest for knowledge I discovered a gem of a blog whilst searching for more information on Charlotte Mason. This blog is called Afterthoughts and she and her followers just started studying a book called Poetic Knowledge: The Recovery of Education by James S. Taylor. (Hosted by Mystie) Can I just say: wonderfully enlightening!?! "But, how does this all relate to The Headgate?" you ask. In the introduction Tibbets says of a classical education, "The most beautiful part of this is that the mother of the classically educated child is no longer part-time teacher, part-time motivator, or part-time nag...In this environment, everybody wins. The children feel free to pursue whatever they wish." A few paragraphs later she speaks of the idea of scheduling "school" time.

"If we were to schedule school time, that would suggest to them that we have in mind some things that they ought to do before they can go do what they want to do; this would hinder the falling in love process...a child knows that their boring 'school work' is something they are 'supposed' to do, they treat it like work, and they get in 'get it done' mode...Now they look at learning with a 'minimum requirement' paradigm, instead of a 'the sky is the limit' paradigm."

Okay, now for the tie in, ooooh! I'm so excited by truth connections! First of all, a quick definition. "Poetic knowledge is not necessarily a knowledge of poetry but rather a poetic (a sensory-emotional) experience of reality...it is not strictly speaking a knowledge of poems, but a spontaneous act of the external and internal senses ..it is...knowledge from the inside out, radically different in this regard from a knowledge about things. In other words, it is the opposite of scientific knowledge." The headgate system depends on the childrens "play turning into learning." Taylor states that all poetic knowledge requires a condition of leisure. Oh, yeah, did you know that, "the Greek word for leisure is skole and, in Latin, scola, which as can easily be seen, becomes school in English"? Something was definitely "lost in translation" with both the words school and leisure! Education is an atmosphere (Charlotte Mason). Free time vs. school time (The Headgate). Love of learning (TJ Ed). Wholesome recreation (Family Proclamation). All these phrases come to mind. Many of the ancients used leisure time to nurture poetic knowledge, to them it was free time and school time. I think we need to revive ancient understanding of certain terms, don't you? A love of learning was there because the atmosphere was there. I know that the principle of, "Wholesome recreation" is given as one ingredient to family happiness and success. That phrase was most likely used because most Americans no longer understand "leisure" as the rejuvenating and carefully guarded time it once was. To me there is something more noble, refreshing, and good about the ancient definition of leisure then todays idea of it. Taylor put it this way, "To be placed at a 45^ angle in a reclining chair, drink in one hand, remote control in the other, in front of the television, is not leisure but something closer to sloth of mind and body." What better way to wisely spend our properly defined leisure time then by learning via poetic knowledge? I know, for most of us, the atmosphere is not up to par but thankfully there will be more of how to go about that as we continue our study of The Headgate. Now, I wanted to keep this post brief so I tried to focus on just one area. I hope you were all able to follow me. Sheepish grin.

Other parts of this section of The Headgate that stood out to me were:

• Our children are like a seed analogy


• "No forcing on the parents part or compliance by the children will aid in their phase progression."


• "worrying...manifests itself in the form of slowed progression."


• Tibbets touched on the roles of males and females, I know that by design each has a vital role and we should nurture those roles rather then try to mix them or subvert them.

Tibbets pointed out that we need "order in the schedule." Although it does not need to be strictly adhered to or perfect it should be "productive and reliable". She goes on to say, "when a family is in survival mode, their schedule is not productive. They exist day to day, but they do not produce much of anything beyond primal needs. " As I read this the second time through I wondered: is this why Satan inspired employers with crazy work hour schedules? Now adays many out there will work a closing shift only to open the next day. My own hubbie works 12 hour shifts bouncing back and forth between night and day. There is NO consistency from week to week, although he is on a 4 wk rotation it is very hard for us to be consistant. This is an area where we could see vast improvement if he could obtain a job with a steady schedule. That may need to wait a few years though. Sigh....